Delegate90-minute diagnostic

You already know what you should be delegating. You just don’t know where to start.

Delegate is a 90-minute diagnostic that gives you:

  • Your top automation, ranked by ROI, not gut feel
  • The decision tree that tells you exactly how to build it
  • The Claude Code skill that makes it run this week
Not sure yet? Read the common questions first →

Built, marketed, and sold by an autonomous Claude Code agent running 24/7.

The trap

It’s not a discipline problem. It’s a sequencing problem.

You have a list. The invoice reconciliation that eats every Friday. The same six support emails on repeat. The content cycle that should be a pipeline and is instead a weekly anxiety spike.

You bought the course. Started three automations. Finished none. Two half-built Claude Code projects, an abandoned n8n flow, a Zapier trial that renewed against your wishes.

That is not a discipline problem. It is a sequencing problem.

Nobody told you which item to start with. You picked whichever one AI Twitter was excited about, spent three months on it, and ended up three months further from the thing that would have freed your calendar. Delegate is the 90-minute exercise that fixes the sequencing.

The framework

Three layers in 90 minutes. Each answers a question no other product bothers to answer.

  • Foundation. What AI actually is.
  • Diagnostic. What you should delegate first.
  • Architecture. Where the work lives and the skill that runs it.
Three layers of the Delegate framework: Foundation, Diagnostic, Architecture.

What you walk away with

Delegate: Deep Reference
All three layers in full, with the why behind every step.
Quick Start guide
90-minute protocol, step-by-step.
Life Audit Workbook
40 prompts that feed real inputs to the matrix.
Bottleneck Scoring Matrix
Live Notion formula. Auto-ranks your tasks.
Master Decision Tree
Tells you what to do with your #1.
First Skill template
Drop-in Claude Code skill, ready to run.
7 Reference Architectures
Real diagnostics from real operating systems.
"When to stop building" guide
Prevents the over-engineering trap.
Aiden support
Reply to your purchase email for direct answers.

This is not a tutorial. It does not teach you how to build a specific agent. It teaches you what to build, in what order, and ships the skill that runs your top task.

How this exists

The page you are reading was written by an autonomous Claude Code agent named Aiden.

Aiden runs on a machine in my office. It drafts content, handles approvals through Telegram, fulfills orders, and iterates on this page overnight. I approve outbound actions from my phone in about fifteen minutes a day. The rest of the time, Aiden works.

The framework you are buying is the exact diagnostic Aiden used to decide what to build first. You are buying the architecture of the thing that made the architecture.

Aiden sending a draft post for approval via Telegram, showing approved, rejected, and edit-requested states.
Reference architectures

Seven complete architectures inside the template.

Three previews below, each a finished diagnostic from a real operating system running on Claude Code. Not tutorials. Outputs.

Multi-venture content pipeline

Three ventures, three times the content.

  • Matrix: ranked #1
  • Branch: automate with approval loop
  • Outcome: four to eight posts a day drafted, approved in two taps, zero net time after setup

Email and Slack inbox triage

Same six conversations repeating, with three real issues hiding inside.

  • Matrix: ranked #2
  • Branch: pair a human with AI
  • Outcome: 90% handled without originating drafts; the three real issues pre-drafted with full thread context

Meeting prep and follow-up

Every calendar event should have a pre-brief and post-note. Almost none do.

  • Matrix: ranked #3
  • Branch: automate with memory
  • Outcome: pre-brief dropped 30 minutes before each meeting, follow-up queued after

Four more inside the template: consulting client ops, morning briefing agent, personal finance automation, client proposal generator.

Common questions

Four things buyers ask before they start.

Is this for non-technical people?

Yes. The guide starts with what AI is, in plain language, no code. The matrix is a Notion formula. The architecture is folders and markdown files. If you can write an email, you can run this.

Is $77 worth it?

One consultant session costs $300+. One wrong first automation costs you three months. The matrix compresses trial-and-error into 90 minutes. If your time is worth more than $50/hour, the math works out before you finish the workbook.

Do I need Claude Code?

The framework is strongest on Claude Code (where CLAUDE.md is native) and the skill template ships for it. If you use a different tool, the diagnostic and architecture still apply; you adapt the skill yourself.

What if I find nothing to delegate?

The workbook covers 40 task categories across your week. If you finish it and genuinely find nothing worth automating, email Aiden for a refund. In practice, the surprise is always which task ranks first, not whether any does.

One time. Delivered in under two minutes.
$77

No subscription. No login. No platform to maintain.

  • Replaces 15 minutes of a consultant's time ($300+/hour).
  • Replaces the rework cost of one wrong first automation (weeks, not days).
  • No subscription, no login, no platform to maintain.
Satisfaction guarantee: finish the Audit Workbook. If you do not have a clearer picture of what to build first, email Aiden for a full refund.